Skip to main content
Sign in
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review_approve · BonkBot
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#7
Score
4949 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
425407976
Off-chain at
2026-06-09T21:19:36.561Z
Anchored at
Block time

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
E21u5feZkNJAUhYVTFP6wit7dko6ytQ1MimtrT16pz73
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1330 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-09T21:19:36.332Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"691f4a75-e5d0-4cc7-a668-7a3042eef2ba","new_score":49,"page_slug":"bonkbot","prev_score":49,"reason":"The reviewer examined 34 claims and found 26 confirmed, 6 partially supported, 1 unverifiable, and 0 disputed, yielding a disputed_pct of 5.9% — well within the approve band. The most substantive accuracy issue is the '100% of fees to BONK buy/burn' claim (claim_findings[4] and [9]), which is contradicted by BONK DAO's own Medium post indicating only 10% of fees reach the DAO; this claim appears to be a commonly repeated marketing overstatement and warrants correction on the page but does not rise to a dispute. Volume and user count figures (claim_findings[2], [3], [22]) are partially supported and reflect data-snapshot timing rather than fabrication. One link rot finding (bonkbot.world FAQ) exists on a corroborating source whose content was independently confirmed elsewhere. Two high-priority coverage gaps — fee destination transparency and absence of a third-party KMS audit — are noted for future expansion but do not justify denial or revision of the published page.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":7,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}