Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review_revise · Chainflip
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#4
Score
53 → 53 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
462169986
Off-chain at
2026-10-27T18:20:43.461Z
Anchored at
2026-10-27T18:21:01.000Z
Block time
2026-10-27T18:21:01.000Z

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
Aj4c28KStPUBrMW1Nbx879fV11hNFbFC2iQSQd9C9AM1
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (2145 chars)
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"b648f0a0f5954a6aa971e38ded80114a","band_override":null,"blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T18:20:43.139Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.0909,"investigation_id":"48b42a99-3bbe-4bc7-8910-0d744aa21dc0","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":53,"page_slug":"chainflip","prev_score":53,"reason":"The core account of the September 12, 2026 TRON USDT exploit (amount, timing, mechanism, pause, patch, balance reset) is confirmed by two independent news outlets in claim_findings[0-6] and [11]. Only the TOCTOU analysis (claim_findings[10]) could not be found in cited sources, and the founder list (claim_findings[8]) could not be checked because the source blocked the reviewer. The page is revised for minor issues because it omits two material developments, the reported TRON route restart and a vault shortfall that makes reimbursement depend on future funding (omission_findings[0] and [2]), and its '$6 billion' volume figure understates current numbers (claim_findings[9]). It is not worse than minor because every core allegation holds and the omissions are about later developments, not errors in what the page says.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":11,"sequence_num":4,"severity_override":{"applied":true,"band":"minor","from_band":"approve","reason":"Claim findings alone put the page in the approve band (1 of 11 scored findings unverifiable, about 9%; one further finding excluded as source_blocked). However, omission_findings[0] (TRON route reportedly restarted around Sept 17, while the page describes it as excluded) and omission_findings[2] (vault holds far less USDT than providers are owed) are both material, and a high-priority coverage gap flags the page as about six weeks stale. Escalated one band to minor. The subject status does not contradict the page, so significant is not warranted."},"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}