Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · Peapods Finance
- Sequence
- #4
- Score
- 46 → 46 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 464291251
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-02T00:19:33.761Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-02T00:19:41.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-02T00:19:41.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- F9LW64aeFbYh3JTTaY6bZnRXYRdUfYsFEnWecaqBLUA4
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1544 chars)
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"7a32e8f45507bf8d5978fe3258d36a8b","band_override":null,"blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-11-02T00:19:33.495Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.125,"investigation_id":"a52f59b4-f668-4cad-bda9-6dfe809284bb","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":46,"page_slug":"peapods-finance","prev_score":46,"reason":"The three incidents (December 2023 reentrancy, February 2025 slippage attack, July 2025 oracle attack) and the PEAS token distribution match the sources the reviewer could read (claim_findings[0], [3], [6]). One of eight countable claims could not be verified (claim_findings[7], the 70% TVL decline), giving a disputed rate of about 12.5%, which falls in the minor band. One further finding was blocked by the source and is left out of the count (claim_findings[1], the ZachXBT tweet). The penalty sits in the middle of the band because the summary states that tokens were dumped as fact, while the timing evidence on the page does not show it (claim_findings[1], [2]), and because the page calls ChangeNow and FixedFloat 'mixers' without support (claim_findings[4]). No shutdown or sanction was found, and the only omission is stale market data, rated minor.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":8,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}