Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · Ondo Finance
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 68 → 58 (-10)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 419515571
- Off-chain at
- 2026-05-13T17:29:32.559Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 3tkSRzVtufpTQrhSZxS8im2ry7vyYvpaKUrzVRLob2v3
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1262 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-05-13T17:29:32.347Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"a092ade3-397f-4b42-980b-dabdc8481348","new_score":58,"page_slug":"ondo-finance","prev_score":68,"reason":"The page is factually sound on most major claims (SEC closure, Oasis Pro acquisition, Ondo Chain, Franklin Templeton partnership, security audits), with 18 of 27 claims confirmed. However, five material discrepancies warrant revision: (1) claim_findings[4] and [5] show USDY yield overstated as 3.6–3.75% when July–September 2025 actual yields were 4.29–5.3%; (2) claim_findings[4] shows OUSG minimum incorrectly stated as ~$5,000 versus ~$100,000 per multiple sources; (3) claim_findings[22] shows 21Shares ETF filing date as March 2026 when it was February 6, 2026; (4) claim_findings[27] shows BUIDL market share overstated at ~40%/$2.9B versus ~32%/$2.38B; (5) two high-priority coverage gaps (TVL inflation verification, governance concentration at ~85% team control) remain unaddressed. Disputed % of 7.4% is low, but the disputed yield claim affects investor-facing product performance representation.","score_delta":-10,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}