Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Shibarium Bridge
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 42 → 42 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 464377498
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-02T05:27:41.202Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-02T05:27:52.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-02T05:27:52.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- ACoJosSDWG6SBeUSEmBr71n52kXNbFUPdKxNUiQHK5AV
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1257 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"3fedcf3b871c97d0d25f41df3af29a0e","decided_at":"2026-11-02T05:27:41.148Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.2,"findings_hash":"73JNwJc9hnRTL6tjxff3PoeLmijQpc2GzbTEqFoGEbRC","investigation_id":"4511c051-1302-4bc4-b6aa-bc3bdc34bb74","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":42,"omissions":{"material":1,"total":1},"page_content_hash":"0cb938578807ef80699ad5e5bf5bbdfc584520f015a8ada3e3c7b8b4458eb424","page_slug":"shibarium-bridge","prev_score":42,"reason":"The incident narrative is largely supported by the sources checked, but the page misstates the SHIB amount stolen (72.6B vs 92.6B) and attributes a launch-incident confirmation to PeckShield that Decrypt gives to Beosin. The page stops at October 2025 and omits the 2026 compensation dispute and K9 Finance sunset. Only a sample of claims and sources was checked, and several cited URLs were not fetched.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"subject_status":"operating","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}