Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · StablR
- Sequence
- #4
- Score
- 5 → 5 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 423950659
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-03T04:04:19.677Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- GD3C1La7ftzFEEiyCpM163s9jHxRufA1SdUWP6CTdRBK
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1403 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-03T04:04:19.368Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"67c1f560-0143-47ba-8309-7ce127131ff6","new_score":5,"page_slug":"stablr","prev_score":5,"reason":"The StablR investigation is well-sourced for its core exploit facts: the 1-of-3 multisig configuration, minted token amounts, attacker net profit, and institutional response are consistently confirmed across multiple Tier 1-2 sources including CoinDesk, The Block, and Blockaid's public advisory. The main accuracy concerns are: (1) characterizing van der Meijden as 'co-founder' when StablR's own materials list him as a C-suite executive; (2) stating 'Dutch authorities filed a criminal complaint against Payvision' when the complaint was filed by EFRI to Dutch authorities, and the year cited (2020) differs from the EFRI document date (August 2021); (3) extreme price lows for USDR ($0.40) and EURR ($0.548) are presented alongside sustained depeg figures without clearly distinguishing momentary candle lows from prolonged levels; and (4) the CoinReporter citation is a dead link (404), leaving ZachXBT's precise follow-up timestamp and two tertiary attacker addresses unverifiable. No claims were found to be flatly contradicted by credible counter-sources.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}