Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-10T15:37:39.508Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"fbbc210c-589b-423d-acbd-c997165eb157","new_score":30,"page_slug":"burgeleth","prev_score":50,"reason":"The reviewer found 2 of 7 claims disputed (43% disputed_pct), placing this page in the 30–60% band requiring significant revision. Most critically, claim_findings[4] identifies a direct internal contradiction: the page summary and Entity Identification section assert 'no verifiable information exists,' while sections[0] on the same page documents a confirmed $3M private-key-compromise drain with a named theft address and a ZachXBT citation the reviewer verified resolves correctly. Claim_findings[6] further disputes the trust score justification of 50 (neutral) as inconsistent with the critical-severity incident already documented on the page. Two high-priority coverage gaps — the unverified $3M aggregate and the misleading summary — indicate the page requires editorial correction before it accurately represents the evidence it already holds.","score_delta":-20,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}