Verify a decision

{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-08-18T17:40:29.450Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"85b48dbf-2c35-4ccd-ad5c-afa98e4b7570","new_score":42,"page_slug":"orion-protocol","prev_score":42,"reason":"The page is well-sourced and factually accurate on its central event, the February 2023 reentrancy exploit: dollar figures, technical mechanism, audit-scope gap, CEO statements, laundering path, and the 2024 Lumia rebrand all check out against independent reporting and, where fetchable, the cited sources directly. Editorial language is appropriately hedged throughout — the page never conflates Orion with the attacker, does not assert fraud, and explicitly notes the absence of confirmed fund recovery rather than implying one occurred. The main weaknesses are minor: a few granular figures (gas cost, total ETH stolen, Uniswap V2 as flash-loan source) are true but not verifiable in the specific sources the page cites for them, one direct-quote claim (Kal Ali's social media post) could not be independently located, and the page omits post-rebrand security posture and LUMIA token-supply dilution, both of which would sharpen an otherwise accurate account.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}