Skip to main content
Sign in
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review · Dual Finance
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#2
Score
62 → 62 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
423652944
Off-chain at
2026-06-01T19:11:49.291Z
Anchored at
—
Block time
—

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
PbQr92yDebZuKSkbfS4xHoKp7oQoFj8khz14wcCtNQx
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1043 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-01T19:11:49.098Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"fd88503e-2e62-405b-8106-3f18b22995cd","new_score":62,"page_slug":"dual-finance","prev_score":62,"reason":"The Dual Finance investigation page is largely accurate, with 30 of 34 atomic claims confirmed by independent sources. The two most significant findings are: (1) the official security documentation explicitly states no formal code audit has ever been completed, which is stronger than the page's hedged language implies; and (2) the timeline incorrectly attributes Dual Finance's hackathon win to the Riptide hackathon when it was actually the Solana Summer Camp hackathon. The page's omission of the 1 billion DUAL max supply (vs 146M total supply) is a meaningful tokenomics gap. The TVL and price data are confirmed but the 'mid-2025' framing is now temporally stale given we are in mid-2026.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}