Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · StablR — Multisig Exploit and EURR/USDR Depeg
- Sequence
- #6
- Score
- 28 → 21 (-7)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 464362717
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-02T04:34:28.685Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-02T04:35:02.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-02T04:35:02.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- C3zdp6Stms4DMMsx4uWqbVL54hDDU9GMuBDdqvViFRnm
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1663 chars)
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"db8a53d4d6ae99c1bb343f88b89a0d45","band_override":null,"blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-11-02T04:34:28.421Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.25,"investigation_id":"3758620e-d099-427e-aa60-da826e35cd86","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":21,"page_slug":"stablr-multisig-exploit-and-eurr-usdr-depeg","prev_score":28,"reason":"None of the page's claims were disputed. The core exploit facts (claim_findings[0], [1], [3]) match The Block, a Tier 2 source. Two of the eight checkable claims (the Payvision fine attribution in claim_findings[7] and the Tether investment date in claim_findings[8]) could not be verified because the reviewer did not fetch those sources. That puts the unverified share at 25%. The 20M+ unbacked-token figure rests only on an advocacy source (EFRI), and the page does not reconcile it with the roughly 12.85M minted. The page also contains stray editorial wording about 'a prior version of this page'. One claim (the 2.7M EURR burn) was left out of the percentage because its source blocked the reviewer. The penalty is kept small because the reviewer's confidence was moderate and the unverified claims are peripheral or already hedged on the page.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":-7,"score_limit":{"applied":-7,"limited":true,"proposed":-8,"rule":"second_opinion_agreed","second":-7},"scored_claims":8,"sequence_num":6,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}