Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · Taj Tarsha / Few and Far Limited
- Sequence
- #8
- Score
- 25 → 25 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 464282640
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-01T23:48:56.691Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-01T23:49:04.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-01T23:49:04.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- gRuMgbvZEc9Rnz125PRkYr818m6qX8TKibdouyEHhNj
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1500 chars)
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"0c098f4eaf537389c10ee5546172c8f4","band_override":null,"blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-11-01T23:48:56.424Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.1,"investigation_id":"6c69efb6-4853-4cbe-a95d-2e4e49b18bd5","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":25,"page_slug":"taj-tarsha-few-and-far-limited","prev_score":25,"reason":"The page's core figures (more than $10M raised, at least 67 investors, 95M tokens, two counts, Judge Kaplan, arrest and bond) were confirmed, and no claim was disputed. Of 10 checkable findings, one (claim_findings[4], the August 2026 bond status) could not be verified, which puts the page at the 10% boundary. We chose a minor revision over approval for two reasons. First, claim_findings[5] and [6] state 'no working marketplace' as fact when it is an unadjudicated prosecution allegation. Second, the review flagged a high-priority coverage gap: the page has no docket status after August 2026. One finding about the token's price collapse was excluded from the percentage because the source blocked the reviewer. The DOJ page also returned empty, so some confirmations rest on secondary summaries.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":10,"sequence_num":8,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}