Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Nelly
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 48 → 48 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 423950677
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-03T04:04:23.003Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- dedrfht2mYocmcKjxSCawVGajYLL8BiiDeavQxEGgr5
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (976 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-03T04:04:22.743Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"bd93d224-985e-4ebc-ae8a-be2a7da9c5f3","new_score":48,"page_slug":"nelly","prev_score":48,"reason":"The page's factual claims are well-supported by multiple credible contemporary news sources. The two partially-supported findings reflect minor precision issues: (1) at least one on-chain victim loss figure was documented in secondary coverage, making the 'no amounts confirmed' framing an overstatement; and (2) the nature of @NellioETH as a main versus secondary crypto-specific account is not clearly established. No claims were found to be disputed or unsupported by credible evidence. The most significant structural problem is that all five page sections are empty — the page's content lives entirely in the summary and timeline.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}