Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-27T05:08:45.046Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"271e2e99-0e03-4268-a81d-53f986183221","new_score":68,"page_slug":"spiko-eu-t-bills-money-market-fund","prev_score":78,"reason":"Of 40 claims checked, 6 were disputed, giving a disputed rate of 15% (6/40) — within the minor-issues band. Three of those disputes (claim_findings[33], [35], [36]) are timeline dates where the cited source gives a specific day that differs from the page's date; that is treated as a genuine contradiction rather than the rounding seen elsewhere on the page, where sources only offered a month and the finding was correctly marked partially supported instead. A fourth (claim_findings[34]) is more serious: the page's timeline says Spiko obtained MiFID status a full year before the date the page's own body text gives for the same event (claim_findings[11]), an internal contradiction rather than a sourcing gap. The page also states one TVL figure from the same source three different ways in different places (claim_findings[20]) and misdescribes a cited ECB bulletin as not naming Spiko when the reviewer found it does (claim_findings[29]) — both accuracy problems with how the page handles its own citations. Weighed against this, the page's core substantive claims — the fund's regulatory classification, manager, custodian, and technical architecture — were independently verified against primary sources with no factual errors and no adverse allegations were found anywhere on the page, which keeps the penalty toward the lower end of the revise band.","score_delta":-10,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}