Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Gate.io
- Sequence
- #4
- Score
- 32 → 32 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 454772676
- Off-chain at
- 2026-10-09T05:29:59.026Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-10-09T05:30:22.111Z
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- ARZ2xPpnje9m8edvaSt5n8XnoBihC3avnwkQH7ZUhcvd
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (2058 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"b93ab227b1f2954961843ffb6a3a87e7","decided_at":"2026-10-09T05:29:58.699Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.2333,"findings_hash":"ATVt4jk9nM9ckmQuaGT7tzfYhgLE2ogVuWv4qqRtbknn","investigation_id":"8cb38982-caca-4f41-81b3-f93e7d056a99","mode":"findings_only","new_score":32,"page_content_hash":"288e46edabe5ba208529afa3ea615db6e583caabfc573e06fb6a0ff006365a37","page_slug":"gate","prev_score":32,"reason":"The page's core narrative — the 2018 ZachXBT-alleged $234M hack, the 2015 Bter.com hack, the India FIU action, the June 2025 $LA futures incident, and the December 2024 privacy-coin delistings — is substantially corroborated by the cited reporting and by independent sources. However, several specific details are unsupported or wrong: the $LA incident's KuCoin attribution and most of its price figures do not appear in any of the three cited articles (all of which report different, lower figures); a 'personal error by an employee' quote attributed to Gate.io appears in no source and contradicts the cited reporting's account of Gate.io declining to explain the cause; the claimed Vanuatu/VFSC license is unsupported and likely wrong given Gate.io's documented Dubai VARA and Malta MiCA licenses; the Trustpilot score/suspension claim does not match the live page; the DOJ/FBI attribution of the $3B Lazarus figure contradicts the cited source's own attribution to Recorded Future; and a timeline entry claims Gate.io delisted privacy-coin perpetuals in August 2022, which is unsupported and contradicts the page's own, well-sourced December 2024 date for that same event. Two cybercriminal.com citations (used across two sections and sources_used) are now dead, redirecting to a GoDaddy parked-domain page. Headline user/asset-count figures (30M users, 4,600 altcoins) appear stale against the current cited source, which now reports 58M+ users and 4,800+ assets.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}