Verify a decision

{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-14T23:15:49.515Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"37f76c43-1a2b-430c-bcec-29da838671b3","new_score":35,"page_slug":"solana","prev_score":35,"reason":"Blue-chip calibration review (Prompt A). Verdict: over-penalized. Page content is treated as accurate; the trust_score band is miscalibrated. Solana is a legitimate, top-5 cryptocurrency network by market capitalization with an operating mainnet since March 2020. Its trust score of 35/100 (WARNING band) is inconsistent with the entity's actual profile. Nearly every incident cited on the page is attributable to third parties: the Drift $285M hack was a DPRK social engineering attack on Drift Protocol's governance team; the Slope Finance $8M hack was caused entirely by Slope's app negligence; the Pump.fun/Raydium fraud statistics reflect ecosystem-level token issuer abuse, not Solana Foundation conduct; and the FTX/Alameda price impact was collateral damage from a third-party collapse. The page's primary regulatory claim — the SEC v. Coinbase action listing SOL as an unregistered security — is stale: it was dismissed with prejudice in February 2025. Furthermore, the page's own timeline shows SOL reaching a $294 all-time high in January 2025, and the network has run without a major outage since February 2024. Legitimate material caveats remain: ongoing class action litigation (Young v. Solana Labs, still active through 9th Circuit appeal as of 2024), historical network reliability issues, and significant ecosystem-level fraud risk on meme coin launchpads. These justify a CAUTIONARY band (50-69) rather than WARNING. A score of 62 reflects these material-but-not-disqualifying concerns while correctly classifying Solana as a legitimate operator associated with external loss events rather than an entity engaging in fraud.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}