Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review · BullX
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#2
Score
42 → 42 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
443526101
Off-chain at
2026-08-27T13:10:58.958Z
Anchored at
—
Block time
—

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
8H6QBRof1yjUCtacZBUFpwYG79rvXqXjgjxkhHWjyo7Y
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1207 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-08-27T13:10:58.846Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"f0d339b4-be9e-4fc9-8a12-530357b002fe","new_score":42,"page_slug":"bullx","prev_score":42,"reason":"Most factual claims on the page (fee structure, custody model, ToU terms, referral tiers, Trustpilot complaints, impersonation risk, and the April 2025 exit-scam episode) are independently confirmed against live primary and secondary sources. However, the page contains a materially misleading composite statistic (splicing BlockBeats' 1.4M cumulative-registration figure onto its separate 25,000-to-300 active-user collapse figure), misstates a cited source's study duration by roughly 6x (90 days reported as '18 months'), presents a stale April-2025 Axiom market-share peak as a mid-2026 figure, includes one attributed quote ('a producer of software services') not present in the cited primary document, and omits the platform's June 1, 2026 trading suspension entirely, which undercuts the summary's claim that the platform 'remains operational as of mid-2026.'","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}