Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · GooseFX
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 52 → 42 (-10)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 423648333
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-01T18:41:17.502Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- Aefr7LokZyYqcAGVroyFxPuRFQy4E3ZPrrpH3wz8EoW8
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1268 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-01T18:41:17.209Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"88289f01-6a2b-4b8b-a69f-ac86fe4f5b29","new_score":42,"page_slug":"goosefx","prev_score":52,"reason":"The review confirmed 20 of 31 claims outright and found 3 disputed. The most significant error is in claim_findings[22]: the page conflates the GOFX all-time high with the IDO price of $0.125, when CoinGecko (Tier 1) confirms the actual ATH was approximately $0.41–$0.48 reached November 13, 2021. claim_findings[27] finds the X follower count of 82,000+ is substantially overstated — current data shows ~32,300 followers, and no corroboration for an 82K peak was found. claim_findings[12] identifies that the page incorrectly states vesting schedules were not publicly disclosed, when aggregators ICO Drops and ChainBroker both published seed vesting terms. None of these errors affect the page's central conclusion that GooseFX was a commercial failure rather than a fraud, which remains well-supported. Revision is warranted to correct the ATH figure, the follower count, and the vesting disclosure characterization.","score_delta":-10,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}