Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · AzukiDAO
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 28 → 28 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 466744153
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-08T02:16:34.129Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-08T02:17:21.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-08T02:17:21.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- HBj1HcJqcXixRb3LsoAqZPPejFEkCbRPeJoAsx79EE6N
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1333 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"b17b19e7e4cf0eff8dbc0c742bcfa590","decided_at":"2026-11-08T02:16:34.084Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.5714,"findings_hash":"AFiNhMZ3oBYWgfXyC3wsmzqofJteYx53pMXYJvsYb1e2","investigation_id":"cd15bdec-d08b-4c17-b734-cd6b38210cf1","judge_def_hash":"750934ecb48272224909b7430fab271676d391380fbc821acbe7ee7e4cac2fa3","new_score":28,"omissions":{"material":1,"total":2},"page_content_hash":"78dbff38b0f1817dd26fdc0c976f7cae804ba3fec0f3e690657f651a8051227b","page_slug":"azukidao","prev_score":28,"reason":"The core exploit facts (about 35 ETH, about $68,000, two attackers, claim contract paused) and the governance figures (36 votes, 88 percent, one wallet near 40 percent of yes votes) match the cited reporting. The MetaSleuth disclosure date of July 4 conflicts with DL News, which reported it on July 3. The page also omits the November 2023 rebrand to Bean and the dropped lawsuit, and it overstates the link between ZachXBT's findings and AzukiDAO. Only a sample of claims was checked.","reviewer_def_hash":"3839668b232611e5b26db72079d64745f8e57e919b8a379e79b44ba4a52c845b","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"subject_status":"rebranded","subject_status_contradicts_page":true,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}