Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · CATFI Memecoin / Eth Father (Park)
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 2 → 0 (-8)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 422983032
- Off-chain at
- 2026-05-29T17:23:33.494Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- BC7fpwQfzDyMWhurRVbjgu4jaUtU2erB8CSdfER1sDs
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1359 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-05-29T17:23:32.984Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"114254dd-e881-4ac9-bf57-fa89473ff9f1","new_score":0,"page_slug":"catfi-memecoin-eth-father-park","prev_score":2,"reason":"The core factual record for the CATFI rug pull is well-supported: nine of twelve evaluated claims are fully confirmed by multiple independent sources including Tier 1 outlets (Decrypt), and the four accepted submissions all verify as supporting evidence. The primary issue identified by the reviewer is claim_findings[10]: all four sources cited in sections[3] concern the May 2024 GCR account hack involving a different token ('CAT' by the 'Sol team'), not CATFI or the Park/'Eth Father' group. No credible source was found linking the CATFI team to the GCR incident — the sourcing is a material misattribution. Additionally, all six page sections have empty content and heading fields, making it impossible to fully evaluate what narrative claims those source clusters are meant to support. The disputed_pct of 8.3% is within the approve band, but the high-priority GCR misattribution gap and the structurally incomplete section content push toward revision rather than outright approval.","score_delta":-8,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}