Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Bedrock Protocol
- Sequence
- #4
- Score
- 41 → 41 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 443508332
- Off-chain at
- 2026-08-18T15:28:01.402Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 4n8DzorAhYr4rYBF4xYuP24SuwZ4N4u8676QasPvhvsw
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1365 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-08-18T15:28:01.295Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"115a5a12-8658-46ed-a28a-82a146c39d24","new_score":41,"page_slug":"bedrock-protocol","prev_score":41,"reason":"The page's core narrative -- a September 27, 2024 minting-function exploit that drained ~$2M from Bedrock's uniBTC liquidity pools, followed by a June 2025 Fuzzland disclosure alleging an ex-employee insider was responsible -- is well supported by multiple independent, credible sources, and the page correctly hedges the unconfirmed Fuzzland insider allegation rather than presenting it as established fact. Minor issues found: a small numeric discrepancy in the amount of uniBTC minted (30.8 vs. ~28.8 in independent on-chain traces), one claim (proposed airdrop/snapshot) resting solely on an unfetchable X post, a citation-attribution mismatch on the Pendle/Corn pause claim, and a coverage gap around Bedrock's corporate affiliation (GoldenBull Enterprise) and the sharper contemporaneous criticism of its unaudited deployment and slow response found in at least one independent source (rekt.news) that the page's neutral framing omits. No unhedged allegations, link rot, or source contradictions were found.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}