Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
- Sequence
- #5
- Score
- 26 → 26 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 457510147
- Off-chain at
- 2026-10-16T04:50:49.421Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-10-16T04:50:50.851Z
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- F8hmhtRjk8bV89FbotidD6UPkEkw5rpUZ1xkkNE49ypQ
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1891 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"ace2d4587b3ed8faf4dffb32098e3c51","decided_at":"2026-10-16T04:50:49.241Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.05,"findings_hash":"3VAB6x3vz3CvsaMPfGWAsctgrqoTnUJ9mZudchhqGqiy","investigation_id":"0a959a2e-0209-4d1a-88ab-83cbc7de3262","mode":"findings_only","new_score":26,"page_content_hash":"324e4a17b5be02e0286b83113ed9add283ce21653cc0ebd580050ef0113d1a2f","page_slug":"holoworld-ai-ava-token-insider-bundling-scheme","prev_score":26,"reason":"The page's central claims are well supported: the Bubblemaps finding of 23 deployer-linked wallets capturing ~40% of AVA's supply at the November 13, 2024 Pump.fun launch, the subsequent 96%+ price collapse from a $0.33/~$300M-FDV January 2025 peak to roughly $0.01/$10.5M market cap, the Hologram Labs background and $6.5M 2022 Polychain-led seed round, and the absence of formal regulatory action as of mid-2026 all check out against the cited sources and independent corroboration. The main weaknesses are: (1) the Arthur Hayes angel-investor attribution, repeated in both a section and the timeline, is not supported by the CoinDesk source cited for it, even though he is loosely associated with Holoworld elsewhere; (2) a Bubblemaps quotation is spliced from two separate statements and drops a clause, altering it from the verbatim original; and (3) a couple of marketing-style figures (10,000 '3D virtual characters') are not found in the specific source cited, though broadly similar figures circulate on secondary crypto sites. No accepted community submissions were present to review. The investigation would benefit from independent on-chain verification of the specific wallet cluster rather than relying solely on Bubblemaps' own published summary.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":5,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}