Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review_revise · NoOnes Exchange
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#3
Score
34 → 12 (-22)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
443517715
Off-chain at
2026-08-25T22:28:56.044Z
Anchored at
—
Block time
—

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
CgbFnoF7NEg7mFMdAQ6S3j4ED3684dURSd24HhhSQuw7
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1628 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-25T22:28:55.850Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"dd8ac2c9-2e28-4727-a7c0-f4358e26df51","new_score":12,"page_slug":"noones-exchange","prev_score":34,"reason":"Of the 35 claims reviewed, 26 were confirmed and none were found to be false — the mechanical disputed rate is about 9%, which on its own would support approval. But the review found that NoOnes ceased all P2P marketplace, swap, card, off-ramp, gift-card, and Lightning operations on 2026-08-21, four days before this review, after EU sanctions caused compliance vendors to flag its wallets as high-risk, and that the page nowhere mentions this: it still presents 'as of August 2026' user, liquidity, and reserve figures in the present tense as though the exchange were fully operating (claim_findings[1], claim_findings[7], coverage_gaps[0], the latter flagged high priority). Because the page's purpose is to tell a reader whether this exchange is currently safe to use, describing a defunct platform as a live one with current-sounding dollar figures is a material accuracy failure that the disputed-claim count is structurally unable to capture, and it outweighs the otherwise strong accuracy of the page. The underlying enforcement narrative — the DOJ indictment, the FinCEN penalty, and the January 2025 exploit — remains well-corroborated and unchallenged, so denial and delisting are not warranted; the page needs a prompt, substantive update rather than removal.","score_delta":-22,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}