Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Sequence
#2
Score
2 → 2 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
465100352
Off-chain at
2026-11-04T00:28:23.006Z
Anchored at
2026-11-04T00:28:42.000Z
Block time
2026-11-04T00:28:42.000Z

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
FbzZBJ6C2Y5c4JMo14bMHsx8fCi4cKpZDwoeB4W6ASx5
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1379 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"fa5fd6945e3d4104fa6bdec4b9ecff34","decided_at":"2026-11-04T00:28:22.910Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.2857,"findings_hash":"2y9q6hs2unHkSZt72SwFtFB9rNZ7tcwZHZk5vVLbFNpB","investigation_id":"8fba1cf6-a0cd-4354-9881-487443b156e4","judge_def_hash":"750934ecb48272224909b7430fab271676d391380fbc821acbe7ee7e4cac2fa3","new_score":2,"omissions":{"material":0,"total":1},"page_content_hash":"749700ad2089bb382e9189fdf2a2505df1a675227ffbd03c64c0ef1cdcc814fa","page_slug":"clawd-token-fake-clawdbot-ai-scam","prev_score":2,"reason":"The core narrative holds across reputable outlets: handle hijack during the rebrand, a fake Solana $CLAWD token, a roughly $16M peak, a sharp collapse and the founder's denial. Weaker points are the derived $14M loss figure, the bot-monitoring detail not found in the cited Yahoo source, the Pump.fun attribution, and the loosely stated 90% decline. There is also an address casing inconsistency between the text and the Solscan URL. This was a limited spot-check of two fetched sources plus a status search.","reviewer_def_hash":"3839668b232611e5b26db72079d64745f8e57e919b8a379e79b44ba4a52c845b","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"subject_status":"operating","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}