Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_approve · Starknet
- Sequence
- #5
- Score
- 45 → 62 (+17)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 426514651
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-14T23:16:07.363Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- J8VACYUPyygrqZYYxwekJAd1uzuGpjVfdKDC9pE4ytAr
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1601 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-14T23:16:07.256Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"60467ada-cfc0-4f9d-9b8c-1b4c334089c8","new_score":62,"page_slug":"starknet","prev_score":45,"reason":"The calibration review found zero disputed claims across all six claim findings (disputed_pct = 0%). The current score of 45 (WARNING band) is demonstrably too harsh: the largest loss event cited on the page — the zkLend $9.57M exploit (claim_findings[1]) — was a vulnerability in a third-party DeFi protocol built on Starknet, not a flaw in Starknet's own infrastructure, confirmed by Halborn and BlockSec post-mortems. The airdrop controversy and token unlock dispute (claim_findings[2] and claim_findings[3]) reflect governance friction with no user fund loss, and StarkWare's positive response — voluntarily reducing the April 2024 unlock from 13.4% to 0.64% — is noted by the reviewer as evidence of responsive governance. Starknet achieved L2Beat Stage 1 decentralization in May 2025 (claim_findings[4]), a material positive milestone inconsistent with a WARNING classification. A score of 62 (CAUTIONARY band) appropriately reflects real residual concerns — 99% revenue decline from peak, two network outages in 2025-2026, ongoing sequencer externalization, and token unlock opacity (claim_findings[5] and claim_findings[6]) — without conflating ecosystem-level incidents with entity-level fraud. Page content is accurate and remains published.","score_delta":17,"sequence_num":5,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}