Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · Pump.fun
- Sequence
- #4
- Score
- 10 → 0 (-10)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 423160883
- Off-chain at
- 2026-05-30T12:57:57.765Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 77cTvSeEcaA63Q9rJRDF8tDDJWorGnzspzfXhoPZsfwX
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1592 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-05-30T12:57:57.137Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"fa06b8b3-2ac4-4a63-8675-0ab6f6e2465f","new_score":0,"page_slug":"pump-fun","prev_score":10,"reason":"The page is well-sourced on its most consequential claims — the federal class-action lawsuit details, the May 2024 insider exploit, the FCA warning, the Solidus Labs 98.6% fraud rate, and the Lazarus Group laundering findings are all confirmed. However, the reviewer identified three specific errors requiring correction: claim_findings[26] shows the PUMP token section incorrectly states team allocation is 'approximately 40%' (actual: 33%) and claims there was 'no vesting period on team tokens' when a 12-month cliff plus 36-month vest applies; claim_findings[27] shows the '80% decline from ICO price' figure conflates the decline from ATH with the decline from the ICO price; and the graduation mechanism in claim_findings[1] is stale — PumpSwap replaced Raydium as the graduation destination in March 2025, a fundamental business-model change absent from the page. The MistaFuccYou incident in claim_findings[15] is also temporally misplaced, occurring in February 2025 but presented within the November 2024 controversy section. These errors are concentrated in the PUMP ICO and livestream sections and do not undermine the platform risk or legal findings, but they require factual correction before the page can be considered accurate.","score_delta":-10,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}