Skip to main content
Sign in
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review · Axiom
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#1
Score
32 → 32 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
419602865
Off-chain at
2026-05-14T03:10:23.120Z
Anchored at
—
Block time
—

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
iUwrVjb4vQkDpXEfDXHDMPeJH99yiGMNE35ExcKSBMx
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1367 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-05-14T03:10:23.053Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"7f4d6a96-ca13-4a3b-b7d2-a1e568a9f840","new_score":32,"page_slug":"axiom","prev_score":32,"reason":"The Axiom investigation is substantially well-sourced and its core allegations — the ZachXBT exposé, the named individuals, Axiom's response, the Polymarket anomalies, and the revenue milestones — are confirmed by multiple independent Tier 1-2 sources. Three material issues were identified: (1) the $300 million revenue milestone is incorrectly placed in the timeline as 'February 2026' when it was reached approximately October 2025; (2) the page claims Polymarket the platform faced a DOJ/CFTC enforcement action in April 2026, when in fact the action targeted an individual user, not the platform; and (3) the description of auth-axiom.trade as 'medium-risk' understates what PhishDestroy classifies as a 98/100 HIGH-risk domain. The '13 months' duration for the alleged misconduct also appears overstated relative to independent reporting which consistently cites approximately 10 months. The factual errors are not concentrated in the most critical claims but constitute meaningful inaccuracies that should be corrected.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":1,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}