Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-27T11:02:39.020Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"dd592b49-5cdd-4dcf-b6aa-39f2c6ac9a89","new_score":35,"page_slug":"hyperdrive-hl","prev_score":45,"reason":"Every checkable claim on this page held up: the reviewer verified all 16 factual statements in the summary and timeline against outside reporting and found zero disputed or unverifiable items, so disputed_pct computes to 0.0%. But the review also flagged, at high priority, that the page itself contains no actual written content -- all seven sections are empty and cite no supporting sources (coverage_gaps[0]) -- and that it omits a materially relevant fact from a source it lists: Hyperdrive's contracts had passed multiple audits before the exploit that later drained the protocol, and the page never says so (coverage_gaps[1]). A page can have a perfect factual record and still fail to inform readers of the most decision-relevant thing its own cited source contains. That gap, not any false statement, is why this page does not clear a clean approval.","score_delta":-10,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}