Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_approve · Swiftarc Capital LLC / Siddharth Jawahar
- Sequence
- #4
- Score
- 0 → 0 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 462056738
- Off-chain at
- 2026-10-27T11:39:07.223Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-10-27T11:39:31.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-10-27T11:39:31.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- FMrH1JAVhAWzDKWdmFxf3EUMqiESrbeb1LCGwqmii869
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1584 chars)
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"5caf171cc250bcd6ca1afa4320e9d1df","band_override":null,"blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T11:39:06.654Z","decision":"review_approve","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0,"investigation_id":"87cb0bce-0a15-4639-ac7a-7e3a754e9cad","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":0,"page_slug":"swiftarc-capital-llc-siddharth-jawahar","prev_score":0,"reason":"The core allegations hold up against primary sources: the sentencing date, judge, 11-year term and $31.35 million restitution (claim_findings[0]), the scheme dates and amounts (claim_findings[1]), the Texas revocation order (claim_findings[2]) and the guilty plea (claim_findings[3]) were all confirmed by Tier 1 sources. Of the 7 findings, none was disputed and one was excluded because the source was blocked (claim_findings[6], lifestyle spending), leaving a disputed share of 0% of 6. Two findings are only partly supported and are minor wording or date issues: the arrest date, which Wikipedia places in January 2024 (claim_findings[4]), and 'directed' versus 'attempted' on the iPhone wipe (claim_findings[5]). The only omission is minor and the entity's status does not contradict the page. Open coverage gaps are medium or low priority and call for expansion, not a penalty.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":7,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}