Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Eleven Drainer
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 0 → 0 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 464358818
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-02T04:20:51.920Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-02T04:21:06.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-02T04:21:06.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 9c3zBv486EG8FHBKxkFGnpPoea4NPWCYNhPnxmKBnSvK
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1257 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"6cecb77578eef3db0a5cca3b6e8e51de","decided_at":"2026-11-02T04:20:51.872Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.3636,"findings_hash":"9BAmSqLn2hzxcXnrXwLPahdG4k4agdK1mrL8XJLZCxbx","investigation_id":"af61c7c5-5ca5-4e72-9f5a-dc0512ef57c2","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":0,"omissions":{"material":0,"total":1},"page_content_hash":"43b2076bbe634de0265233b8a0b7dee7e3f20c95a0a616807dc19c71adc033e9","page_slug":"eleven-drainer","prev_score":0,"reason":"Core narrative holds: Eleven Drainer is a DaaS kit, the Aerodrome/Velodrome and Gitcoin incidents are corroborated, and the Blockaid figures match. Problems are overstated certainty ($4.2M called 'confirmed', Nov 6-8 described as the majority of losses), a 'four-hour' window not in the Blockaid source, and several unchecked details such as NameSilo. Most key on-chain claims depend on one tier-3 source.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"subject_status":"operating","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}