Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"abb4048e0d77ab77c7d2126ed1a8bd4e","band_override":{"actual_delta":-25,"actual_verdict":"review_revise","disputed_pct":0.6,"expected_delta_range":[-50,-30],"expected_verdict":"review_deny","rationale":"Of 10 claims checked, 2 were disputed (claim_findings[0], [2]) and 4 could not be verified (claim_findings[6]-[9]), giving 60% by count. The disputes are real: a HackMD page by an independent analyst is labeled the team's official postmortem and quoted for a DPRK statement it does not contain, and the $1.42M loss figure is credited to the wrong source. We did not apply the 'failed factcheck' band because the core incident (exploit timeline, Pool Admin dates, fund flows) was confirmed (claim_findings[3]-[5]), none of the unverifiable items was contradicted (the reviewer did not fetch some sources, and a fetch summary may have missed one passage), and reviewer confidence was moderate at 0.6. The page stays under investigation until it cites LND's primary postmortem, which is the only basis of the DPRK attribution (high-priority coverage gap), and fixes the source labels."},"decided_at":"2026-11-03T23:24:36.485Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.6,"investigation_id":"2f7c30c1-4224-4431-b322-5be4c94348e6","judge_def_hash":"750934ecb48272224909b7430fab271676d391380fbc821acbe7ee7e4cac2fa3","new_score":0,"page_slug":"lnd","prev_score":12,"reason":"Of 10 claims checked, 2 were disputed (claim_findings[0], [2]) and 4 could not be verified (claim_findings[6]-[9]), giving 60% by count. The disputes are real: a HackMD page by an independent analyst is labeled the team's official postmortem and quoted for a DPRK statement it does not contain, and the $1.42M loss figure is credited to the wrong source. We did not apply the 'failed factcheck' band because the core incident (exploit timeline, Pool Admin dates, fund flows) was confirmed (claim_findings[3]-[5]), none of the unverifiable items was contradicted (the reviewer did not fetch some sources, and a fetch summary may have missed one passage), and reviewer confidence was moderate at 0.6. The page stays under investigation until it cites LND's primary postmortem, which is the only basis of the DPRK attribution (high-priority coverage gap), and fixes the source labels.","reviewer_def_hash":"3839668b232611e5b26db72079d64745f8e57e919b8a379e79b44ba4a52c845b","score_delta":-25,"score_limit":{"applied":-25,"limited":false,"proposed":-25,"rule":"second_opinion_agreed","second":-28},"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}