Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · Abracadabra Spell
- Sequence
- #4
- Score
- 53 → 53 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 464367822
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-02T04:52:51.998Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-02T04:53:13.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-02T04:53:13.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- BekZx1rr46UARCHEZQgzaJhtqwEthgqmKpCFnm46MFuS
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1966 chars)
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"0f5e49e12107300a21992f2f4ced0364","band_override":null,"blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-11-02T04:52:51.734Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.4,"investigation_id":"e44dde56-bba7-433f-98f5-e5d42700a900","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":53,"page_slug":"abracadabra-spell","prev_score":53,"reason":"About 40% of checkable claims were disputed or unverifiable (4 of 10, excluding one blocked source). The headline TVL peak of $776 million is disputed (claim_findings[1], [2]) because DeFi Llama via Capital.com gives about $6.4 billion, and the $776 million Wonderland timeline figure has no source (claim_findings[3]). The page also hardens an unverified PeckShield allegation into implied fact (claim_findings[4], [5]) and presents the protocol as operating, while the review found a September 2026 wind-down proposal and a MIM depeg since June 2026 that the page omits (subject_status, omission_findings[0]). The three-exploit tally of over $21 million and the Tornado Cash detail were confirmed (claim_findings[0], [6]), so the page is revised and put under investigation rather than denied.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":10,"sequence_num":4,"severity_override":{"applied":true,"band":"significant","from_band":"significant","reason":"The review reports a critical omission and subject_status.contradicts_page=true: a September 2026 DAO proposal to wind down the protocol and MIM, with MIM depegged since June 2026, is not mentioned and the page describes the protocol as operating. The percentage band (40%) is already significant, so the band is held at significant and the penalty is set toward the upper end of that band."},"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}