Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · Phantom Wallet
- Sequence
- #7
- Score
- 57 → 47 (-10)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 425240190
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-09T02:47:35.191Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 42zC6xrGgMFYjLrEJGGU8ST1VaqsPhuJxTt6ZNPsZRfx
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1526 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-09T02:47:34.773Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"534e51fc-2dbe-42e6-86ff-3f144efce521","new_score":47,"page_slug":"phantom-wallet","prev_score":57,"reason":"The review found no fully disputed claims, but three partially_supported findings warrant correction. First, claim_findings[0] identifies a factual error in the founding team section: Chris Kalani is described as a former 0x Protocol engineer and CTO, but multiple sources confirm he is CPO with a product and design background from Facebook and Frog Design — only Millman and Agosti are 0x alumni. Second, claim_findings[18] identifies a version number error in the December 2024 supply chain attack section: the page states version 1.96.7 was compromised, but multiple credible sources including Wiz and The Hacker News confirm the correct version is 1.95.7. Third, claim_findings[12] finds the August 2022 wallet count and dollar figures are imprecise relative to the Solana Foundation's authoritative post-incident report of 9,231 wallets and $4.1M. One instance of link rot was also identified: a Wayback Machine archive URL for the TechCrunch Solana hack article resolves to an unrelated cPanel exploit story. The page is broadly well-sourced and the core narrative is accurate; the issues are correctable factual errors rather than substantive misrepresentations.","score_delta":-10,"sequence_num":7,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}