Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review · SuperRare
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#5
Score
61 → 61 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
457416755
Off-chain at
2026-10-15T23:13:40.481Z
Anchored at
2026-10-15T23:13:46.656Z
Block time
—

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
9VCDWMHUv9EVcriGuKNE22ehUpT8xgenRZh3kSn1PBmH
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1692 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"0fadda8628ecb73c2ab9b2756b4e50d4","decided_at":"2026-10-15T23:13:40.079Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.2069,"findings_hash":"BFCXmPsZRzxKcA1Zyt2YfpExFWEBZRaThJwMAh1Mi8bQ","investigation_id":"652caba3-c5e6-4c5c-adf2-31e2693beb1f","mode":"findings_only","new_score":61,"page_content_hash":"fd1cff5b987f6889fef483a8a4524945499ce361c31f829fe33d88c1dcabbf4b","page_slug":"superrare","prev_score":61,"reason":"The core narrative — founders, funding history, the July 28, 2025 RareStakingV1 exploit (contract address, attacker address, transaction hash, inverted require() logic, Tornado Cash funding timing, frontrunner mechanics, 12% price drop, OWASP classification, 61-wallet reimbursement) and RARE tokenomics/governance structure — is well supported by independent, credible sources and in several cases confirmed down to exact addresses and code snippets. Two material defects were found: the resonance.security URL cited in three sections and the master source list is dead (404), and the page's reported 41% post-reimbursement price surge and 'doubled' derivatives volume do not match the only locatable version of their own cited source, which reports ~35% and ~20x respectively. The total lifetime trading volume figure ($210M) is also meaningfully lower than other reputable NFT trackers' figures (over $300M). The timeline's May 2022 'all-time low' claim is now stale, since RARE set a new, lower all-time low in October 2025. None of these affect the central, well-documented exploit narrative.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":5,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}