Skip to main content
Sign in
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Sequence
#4
Score
1616 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
426514218
Off-chain at
2026-06-14T23:15:44.207Z
Anchored at
Block time

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
BxvVqiVsEd1tFzYWdYjvohHrWbfxR98zxBvaUBFdizQ3
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (2174 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-14T23:15:44.133Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"4353b260-3c61-49c0-b2b6-baf8e07bd172","new_score":16,"page_slug":"cryptocom","prev_score":16,"reason":"Blue-chip calibration review (Prompt A). Verdict: over-penalized. Page content is treated as accurate; the trust_score band is miscalibrated. Crypto.com is a large, legitimate, regulated exchange — not a fraudulent entity. The primary loss events driving the 28/WARNING score are a 2022 hack and a 2023 social-engineering breach, both of which were suffered by Crypto.com at the hands of third parties, and in both cases no user funds were permanently lost (users were fully reimbursed after the 2022 hack; no funds were accessed in the Scattered Spider incident). The SEC investigation that hung over the company was closed with no enforcement action in March 2025, placing Crypto.com in the same regulatory-cleared category as Coinbase, Gemini, and Robinhood. The company has since obtained the full CFTC derivatives license stack and an OCC conditional bank charter — the strongest U.S. regulatory footprint in crypto. The genuine concern is the March 2025 CRO governance incident, where management effectively overrode a 77.97% community opposition to re-mint 70 billion previously burned tokens by wielding 70-80% of validator voting power. This is a material governance controversy warranting a CAUTIONARY designation — it reflects a meaningful failure of decentralization promises and drew credible public criticism from blockchain investigator ZachXBT — but it does not constitute fraud, a Ponzi, or an exit scam under any standard definition. The CEO background note about Ensogo is a real red flag but relates to a prior company's operational failure, not Crypto.com itself. A score of 58 (CAUTIONARY) appropriately acknowledges these governance concerns and the CEO's mixed history while reflecting that this is an actively regulated, operationally sound, 150M-user exchange that makes customers whole after incidents.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}