Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · Hyperliquid
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 38 → 28 (-10)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 426281288
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-13T21:33:51.710Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- BdL97QH7DpW2itpQoKjsR5WSmwnhThz57AkGKCsF4M6g
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1396 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-13T21:33:51.500Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"08752005-1f07-4792-bacf-583564b32b2c","new_score":28,"page_slug":"hyperliquid","prev_score":38,"reason":"The page's core factual claims about validator centralization, North Korea-linked wallet activity, the JellyJelly manipulation mechanics, and the HyperVault rug pull are all substantiated by credible independent sources. However, the reviewer identified a disputed airdrop valuation figure (claim_findings[24]: $1.6B is unsupported at TGE, where sources cite ~$1.2B), a stale user-count and daily-volume metric (claim_findings[20]: page states 300K users and $4B/day when current figures are 1.4M users and ~$8.34B/day), and a material entity mischaracterization in claim_findings[19] where the $1B SEC SPAC filing is attributed to 'the platform' when the filing entity is the legally distinct 'Hyperliquid Strategies.' Two high-priority coverage gaps — absence of on-chain forensic analysis for DPRK-linked wallets and no regulatory or OFAC status section — further support revision. The overall disputed_pct of 10.7% places this in the minor-issues band; the penalty is set at -10 reflecting the stale metrics and entity mischaracterization.","score_delta":-10,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}