Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · DRiP Haus
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 74 → 66 (-8)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 423652968
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-01T19:11:50.677Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- FYFwJNDJYJpmbwhqkiGvg7DMNj3AC7UtiY9kGDrXdFLd
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1406 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-01T19:11:50.450Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"d86589d7-759f-4e4b-9f06-826ffab137ab","new_score":66,"page_slug":"drip-haus","prev_score":74,"reason":"The page is largely accurate on all major structural facts — the Jupiter acquisition, team composition, funding totals, and platform mechanics are confirmed by Tier 1 sources. However, the reviewer identified several errors requiring correction: claim_findings[14] (timeline[1]) places the $3M Placeholder-led round in November 2022, but multiple independent funding databases date it to August 2023 — a disputed factual error of roughly nine months. claim_findings[10] (sections[1]) mischaracterizes the Origami Labs transaction as 'acquired by Nest' when TechCrunch and Norby's own tweet confirm the IP was sold to eFamily while Norby was separately acqui-hired. claim_findings[15] and [16] (sections[2]) understate Coinbase Ventures' and Progression's roles in the $8M round, which was co-led by all three firms. Additionally, two high-priority coverage gaps — post-acquisition operational status through mid-2026 and stale Droplet pricing documentation — represent material blind spots that warrant an update pass before the page is considered current.","score_delta":-8,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}