Skip to main content
Sign in
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review_approve · Goliath Ventures / Christopher Alexander Delgado
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#3
Score
0 → 0 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
423841790
Off-chain at
2026-06-02T16:01:59.770Z
Anchored at
—
Block time
—

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
B2U2SBYQZHWyZiQa8k9MK52VQYLa6kLafXKverLwfEs6
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1221 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-02T16:01:59.542Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"a35c9291-ad0b-4bed-8888-a836ff498f0a","new_score":0,"page_slug":"goliath-ventures-christopher-alexander-delgado","prev_score":0,"reason":"The reviewer evaluated 34 claims and found 28 confirmed by Tier 1 or Tier 2 sources, 4 partially supported, and 2 unverifiable — yielding a disputed_pct of 5.9%, well within the 0-10% approval band. The two unverifiable claims (claim_findings[15] — Jordan Shaw's aggregate $60 million figure; claim_findings[16] — a 'Nicholas Petrillo' investor seeking $40 million) are peripheral supporting details in the victims section, not core allegations about the fraud mechanics or criminal charges, which are extensively confirmed by IRS Criminal Investigation and DOJ Tier 1 sources. No claims were found to contradict credible counter-evidence. Coverage gaps are present but the only high-priority gap is an expansion suggestion (on-chain wallet addresses for independent verification), not a factual deficiency. Reviewer confidence is 0.87.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}