Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
publish · AzukiDAO
- Sequence
- #1
- Score
- →
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 422980046
- Off-chain at
- 2026-05-29T17:03:48.136Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- Dv33XosMakcCLzGyYixNLKUWAintgxPchCKN6BdswmTw
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (6284 chars)
{"actor":"system:backfill","investigation_id":"cd15bdec-d08b-4c17-b734-cd6b38210cf1","kind":"publish","page_slug":"azukidao","published_at":"2026-05-29T17:03:48.039Z","sequence_num":1,"snapshot":{"content_type":"investigation","entity_name":"AzukiDAO","sections":[{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.coindesk.com/web3/2023/07/03/azukidao-votes-on-reclaim-of-20k-ether-after-botched-elementals-nft-mint","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://decrypt.co/147115/angry-azuki-elementals-holders-unite-to-demand-39-million-refund-lose-thousands-more-in-subsequent-hack","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.bitdegree.org/crypto/news/azukidao-aims-to-claw-back-20000-ether-from-azuki-nft-founder-zagabond","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://decrypt.co/147115/angry-azuki-elementals-holders-unite-to-demand-39-million-refund-lose-thousands-more-in-subsequent-hack","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.coindesk.com/web3/2023/07/03/azukidao-votes-on-reclaim-of-20k-ether-after-botched-elementals-nft-mint","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://cryptodaily.co.uk/2023/07/azuki-dao-to-sue-project-founder-over-allegations-of-misconduct","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.dlnews.com/articles/defi/hackers-steal-35-eth-in-azukidao-airdrop-exploit/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.quillaudits.com/blog/hack-analysis/azuki-dao-hack","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://x.com/dedaub/status/1675983033168453632","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.web3isgoinggreat.com/single/azukidao-exploit","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://cryptorank.io/news/feed/5ad75-199775-azukidao-suffers-exploit-leads-to-35-eth-loss","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://coinpaper.com/248/azuki-founder-admits-to-rugging-three-projects-in-a-year","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.techtimes.com/articles/275285/20220511/azuki-nft-three-failed-projects-floor-price.htm","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://nftnow.com/news/azuki-creator-in-hot-water-amidst-rug-pull-allegations/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://beincrypto.com/azuki-nfts-creator-to-refund-investors-after-admitting-to-rug-pulls/","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.coindesk.com/web3/2023/07/03/azukidao-votes-on-reclaim-of-20k-ether-after-botched-elementals-nft-mint","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/azukidao/","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://decrypt.co/147115/angry-azuki-elementals-holders-unite-to-demand-39-million-refund-lose-thousands-more-in-subsequent-hack","type":"other","url":""}]},{"content":"","heading":"","severity":"medium","sources":[{"credibility":3,"name":"https://decrypt.co/120144/azuki-twitter-account-hacked","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://www.coindesk.com/web3/2023/01/27/nft-collection-azukis-twitter-account-hacked-leading-followers-to-malicious-link","type":"other","url":""},{"credibility":3,"name":"https://crypto.news/two-scam-twitter-accounts-rugged-over-80-3-eth-last-month/","type":"other","url":""}]}],"sources_used":[],"summary":"AzukiDAO is an informal decentralized autonomous organization formed in late June 2023 by a self-described group of 72 to 74 Azuki NFT holders in response to widespread community outrage over the Azuki Elementals NFT launch. Within days of its formation, AzukiDAO's BEAN governance token airdrop contract was exploited via a signature replay vulnerability, resulting in the theft of approximately 35 ETH ($68,000). On-chain investigator ZachXBT had previously flagged the Azuki project's founder Zagabond (Alex Xu) for alleged involvement in multiple prior abandoned NFT projects, and his findings were central to the community grievances that motivated AzukiDAO's creation.","timeline":[{"date":"2022-05-09","event":"Azuki founder Zagabond publishes blog post acknowledging prior involvement in three abandoned NFT projects: CryptoPhunks, Tendies, and CryptoZunks. ZachXBT alleges Zagabond profited approximately $3 million while holders were left with worthless assets. Azuki floor price drops roughly 50 percent.","source":""},{"date":"2023-01-27","event":"Official Azuki Twitter account is hacked; attackers post malicious 'land mint' links and drain over $750,000 in USDC, NFTs, and ETH within 30 minutes.","source":""},{"date":"2023-06-27","event":"Azuki Elementals NFT collection launches. 20,000 NFTs sell out in 15 minutes, generating approximately $38 million for Chiru Labs. Community backlash erupts over artwork similarity to original Azuki collection and floor price collapse.","source":""},{"date":"2023-06-29","event":"AzukiDAO BEAN governance token contract deployed on Ethereum, approximately two days before the first governance vote is submitted.","source":""},{"date":"2023-06-30","event":"AzukiDAO officially formed by approximately 72 to 74 self-described Azuki holders. BEAN token airdrop to Azuki NFT holders begins. Exploit occurs: two attackers drain approximately 35.08 ETH ($68,000) via a signature replay vulnerability in the airdrop contract. Developers pause the contract.","source":""},{"date":"2023-07-02","event":"AzukiDAO submits governance proposal to hire lawyers and sue Zagabond, seeking recovery of 20,000 ETH from Chiru Labs.","source":""},{"date":"2023-07-03","event":"AzukiDAO governance vote closes. 88.35 percent of BEAN token voting weight supports the proposal to recover Elementals mint proceeds. CoinDesk reports on the vote. Exploit is further detailed in press.","source":""},{"date":"2023-07-04","event":"BlockSec MetaSleuth publicly discloses full details of the AzukiDAO signature replay exploit. Dedaub confirms the vulnerability on-chain.","source":""}]},"v":1}