Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review · Voyager Digital
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#4
Score
0 → 0 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
457829863
Off-chain at
2026-10-17T00:01:41.877Z
Anchored at
2026-10-17T00:02:07.105Z
Block time
—

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
9L3RQExzE2sPogmbmgfNEFPRXJqwSNtX3ee68Y82fzhq
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (2045 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"1052fcd44e19b20650a1495d18e0ea3a","decided_at":"2026-10-17T00:01:41.257Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.2258,"findings_hash":"Dxrf1m6ngkM56DKJ2Zd4rBvuQd7vB9HMtprjeGoDWuWs","investigation_id":"e5d80424-d076-4125-977e-ddc773064699","mode":"findings_only","new_score":0,"page_content_hash":"c5396e377c02e2a240800952536f0cb9fa5a207d63296af26d730e20ed8ec92a","page_slug":"voyager-digital","prev_score":0,"reason":"The page's core narrative — Voyager's founding, its unsecured exposure to Three Arrows Capital, the FTX/Alameda entanglement, the Chapter 11 filing, the failed FTX and Binance.US acquisitions, and the FDIC/Fed, FTC, and CFTC enforcement actions — is well supported by primary regulatory sources and corroborated by independent reporting, and the great majority of dates, dollar figures, and quotes check out verbatim against primary documents (FDIC, Federal Reserve, FTC, CFTC press releases). However, several specific figures do not hold up: the claim that the SEC objected to the FTX deal (not just Binance.US) on securities grounds could not be corroborated and appears to be an overstatement; the bankruptcy-filing asset breakdown ($658M/$355M/$168M) is not supported by any of the section's cited sources or by independent reporting; the state regulator list omits Indiana; the CFTC's press release does not actually name Three Arrows Capital as the unsecured counterparty (it says 'Firm A'); the November 2022 timeline entry conflates FTX's bankruptcy filing with Bankman-Fried's arrest, which actually occurred in December 2022; and the recurring ~70% total creditor recovery figure (appearing in the summary, the Creditor Recovery section, and the timeline) is not supported by the cited sources, which point to a cumulative recovery closer to 60%. None of the accepted_submissions evidence was available to review (the array was empty).","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}