Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Arthur Hayes (Maelstrom)
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 42 → 42 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 425574938
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-10T15:42:13.471Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- DYWA3HiAb6Lq4EC29PCqVpJFKjZJxzFUB4ZQg9PpWt9s
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1322 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-10T15:42:13.377Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"2f47bf9f-f3a7-4d97-8569-77aac3f87864","new_score":42,"page_slug":"arthur-hayes-maelstrom","prev_score":42,"reason":"The page is substantially accurate on its core factual claims — the BitMEX founding, DOJ/CFTC enforcement actions, sentencing, pardon, and the June 2026 exit liquidity controversy are well-sourced and correct. The most significant finding is a misattribution: the widely-quoted 'vindication' statement about the pardon is attributed to Hayes but was actually made by co-founder Benjamin Delo. Secondary issues include a date error in the CFTC co-founder penalty timeline entry (May 5, 2022 vs. August 10, 2022), a misquote of Hayes' ZachXBT response ('willing buyer' vs. 'willing seller'), the Arkham report date being described as December 2025 when the relevant update was February 2026, and a section heading that implies Maelstrom's own fund underperformed when Vaidya was criticising a third-party fund. The WLD post-note price rise figure (88%) could not be confirmed; available sources report approximately 62%. No link rot was detected on the checked URLs.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}