Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review · Bitforex
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#3
Score
0 → 0 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
464380023
Off-chain at
2026-11-02T05:36:23.794Z
Anchored at
2026-11-02T05:36:51.000Z
Block time
2026-11-02T05:36:51.000Z

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
Hi9w7SkxMNUmLyRKokSvEzUoMwCCVpqcCL6fwVRokXeh
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1359 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"8180608f53865d55efdac28f31e82b5a","decided_at":"2026-11-02T05:36:23.737Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.1667,"findings_hash":"EJcKd5w6QaVKjXKiA25HJAu1J2gDC8M2rrxemWmLfbvx","investigation_id":"399ea610-b1e9-4398-a3b8-3e9cb961791e","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":0,"page_content_hash":"c29b4a4a1e3fd4adcf6885d99a012071c4e4f936057c83f5eb32c476fa15e25a","page_slug":"bitforex","prev_score":0,"reason":"The core narrative (Feb 2024 ~$56.5M hot wallet drain, SFC alert March 4 2024, July 2024 detention claim) is well supported by the sources checked. Minor overstatements: 'permanently' suspended deposits, virtual-office wording stronger than DL News, and a 150-member figure that conflicts with DL News's ~800. The TRB/OMI supply percentages and OMI crash were not found in the cited DN Institute page. Only a sample of claims was checked; the Hyperliquid/Garrett Jin section, wash-trading section and Japan FSA claims were not independently verified.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"subject_status":"shut_down","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}