Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review · StableMagnet
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#3
Score
0 → 0 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
464269843
Off-chain at
2026-11-01T23:03:02.369Z
Anchored at
2026-11-01T23:03:24.000Z
Block time
2026-11-01T23:03:24.000Z

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
ELBDKhskzACiPVeQbqPhAtvfKs1PEY7AWTH8C6jXAPtT
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1439 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"43706de8d169884d9f029125e10a731e","decided_at":"2026-11-01T23:03:02.193Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.3571,"findings_hash":"AzVPSA9k4GG72NtSmBRvcTSiyjt2q9PQE58hBuNYr5AE","investigation_id":"3699ba84-0fa1-46e7-9d11-c82e2519a088","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":0,"omissions":{"material":1,"total":2},"page_content_hash":"9d32fd1a600fba64006696ecf3a5a443d0123000c2fe93ddae917dba55963119","page_slug":"stablemagnet","prev_score":0,"reason":"The core incident is well supported: the June 2021 rug pull, about $27M lost, the unverified SwapUtils library, the explorer linked-library gap and the TechRate audit gap all match Rekt, Halborn and Revoke.cash. The recovery narrative is the weak point. The $24M returned by 1 Dec 2022 figure is attributed to a Quadriga page that does not say it, and it conflicts with Revoke.cash, which says only a small part is confirmed returned. Arrests actually occurred in August 2021 and the page omits that. The AnySwap bridge detail, the per-token split and the ZachXBT flagging are unsupported.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"subject_status":"shut_down","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}