Skip to main content
Sign in
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review · Hyperliquid
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#2
Score
38 → 38 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
426281304
Off-chain at
2026-06-13T21:33:51.615Z
Anchored at
—
Block time
—

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
Cagj37i6B1Nuad1kAimZsChZrLrxGu6UMLnpUv2TMbK1
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1095 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-13T21:33:51.500Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"08752005-1f07-4792-bacf-583564b32b2c","new_score":38,"page_slug":"hyperliquid","prev_score":38,"reason":"The page's core factual assertions — validator centralization concerns, North Korea wallet activity, the JELLY manipulation mechanics, the HyperVault rug pull, and Hyperliquid's no-VC funding model — are all substantiated by credible independent sources. The main weaknesses are: the DeFiLlama source URL is blocked (link rot), several metrics are stale (user count, daily volume), the SPAC filing is misattributed to Hyperliquid rather than the distinct entity Hyperliquid Strategies, and the $13.5M HLP loss is described as a realized loss when it was an unrealized peak that was not fully realized. The airdrop valuation figure of $1.6B is inconsistently supported. Coverage gaps are significant around regulatory history and on-chain forensics.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}