Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · BurgerSwap
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 41 → 41 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 465086861
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-03T23:39:58.974Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-03T23:40:27.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-03T23:40:27.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 9NrC6sAoFV5ACPsSCJPgSCLGXW2fPuxV6exmqmRaSzuj
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1444 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"853a34068bf2a1c431a0121621d52fd9","decided_at":"2026-11-03T23:39:58.915Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.5,"findings_hash":"98SUcAdbPw95RmXAuFiNqz34TNA2TKKWygz83rLZrMVP","investigation_id":"eba94768-6699-40f8-921e-af5980db77fa","judge_def_hash":"750934ecb48272224909b7430fab271676d391380fbc821acbe7ee7e4cac2fa3","new_score":41,"omissions":{"material":0,"total":1},"page_content_hash":"483aa82579bfb9583544413dd7366fa322ef265f78d133f66c9257805f713ac7","page_slug":"burgerswap","prev_score":41,"reason":"The core narrative holds: a May 2021 flash loan and reentrancy exploit of about $7.2M across 14 transactions, Hayden Adams's comment on the removed x*y=k line, and the team's promise to cover losses are corroborated by The Block and search coverage. The price-drop figure differs between outlets (18% vs 27%), the May 27 vs May 28 dating in the compensation section is unexplained, and the ZachXBT statement is unsourced and unverified. Only a few claims were checked in depth because SlowMist and other sources were not readable and time was limited. Current status after 2022 is not established.","reviewer_def_hash":"3839668b232611e5b26db72079d64745f8e57e919b8a379e79b44ba4a52c845b","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"subject_status":"rebranded","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}