Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · DeXe
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 55 → 43 (-12)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 425395348
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-09T19:56:21.498Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 2vjGdosSTuGTbi5vJF4p1sLN7Fh21VDtBuoNqkhvNduZ
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1310 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-09T19:56:21.378Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"c055857b-b4fa-48ea-8b23-7071137d6fb2","new_score":43,"page_slug":"dexe","prev_score":55,"reason":"The page is directionally accurate on protocol fundamentals, TVL growth trajectory, staking module launch, and holder count, with 7 of 12 claims confirmed. However, the review identified one significant factual risk: claim_findings[9] asserts that World Liberty Financial (WLFI) uses DeXe infrastructure, but multiple independent sources document WLFI as built on Aave V3 with no mention of DeXe — this claim is unverifiable and contradicted by available evidence, and it appears as a stated risk factor in the published page body. Additionally, claim_findings[4] contains a stale price drawdown figure (63% cited versus approximately 41% actual as of June 2026), and the $1.7B TVL figure in claim_findings[1] rests solely on a low-credibility single source without Tier-1 on-chain corroboration. The page should remove or source the WLFI-DeXe integration claim, update the price drawdown figure, and cross-reference TVL data against DeFiLlama before republishing.","score_delta":-12,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}