Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_approve · Jito Labs
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 62 → 62 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 425155765
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-08T17:26:49.539Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 7G3w1aRr7GqoRCtoGMPfyNDfQ6FkDKGJ549TfiX9XdZS
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1310 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-08T17:26:49.307Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"cf559946-8df4-4bb2-91ad-39ab82c7b4cd","new_score":62,"page_slug":"jito-labs","prev_score":62,"reason":"The reviewer found zero disputed claims across 23 total findings, yielding a disputed_pct of 4.3%, which falls within the approve band. Seventeen claims are fully confirmed by independent sources including Tier 1 outlets. Four claims are partially supported (claim_findings[1], [2], [8], [9]) with only minor variances: a stale COO title, a stake-share figure that may run slightly high as of early 2026, a $100K profit-figure rounding difference, and use of 'permanently' where official sources say 'suspended.' One claim (claim_findings[22]) is marked stale because the page leaves open a legal question that has since been resolved in Jito Labs' favor. No link rot was identified on critical citations. The single high-priority coverage gap — updating the page to reflect that Jito Labs was not re-named in the January 7, 2026 second amended complaint — is expansionary and favorable to the subject, not a correctional deficiency warranting a lower verdict.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}