Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-25T08:35:24.666Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"25b13922-977d-4211-a52e-e95f7d52bd0f","new_score":22,"page_slug":"triple-a-treasury-hack-july-2026","prev_score":28,"reason":"The fact-check found no disputed or unverifiable claims out of 26 checked (disputed_pct = 0%), and the page's core facts -- the ~$11.8M loss, 31-hour drain window, seven affected chains, hot-wallet root cause, client-fund segregation, and Triple-A's solvency statement -- are consistently corroborated, including a verbatim-verified quote (claim_findings[4]) and a clean event-date check with no title/event mismatch. Five claims were only partially supported: an ETH-amount figure (5,287) stated as settled in the summary despite the page's own bundled sources reporting 5,227-5,287 (claim_findings[3] and [9]), a 'first digital-currency payment company' superlative that traces mainly to the company's own self-description (claim_findings[5]), and a regulatory detail that is accurate but not backed by the specific sources cited for that section (claim_findings[14]). None of these amount to a factual error, but together with a high-priority coverage gap -- an August 6, 2026 report that roughly $5M tied to the attacker's wallet moved through Tornado Cash, which postdates the page's newest sources and is not yet reflected (coverage_gaps[0]) -- the page needs a light update rather than a clean pass. The gap reflects the incident continuing to develop after publication rather than an error made at the time of writing, which keeps the penalty modest.","score_delta":-6,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}