Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-25T19:47:39.972Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"3a3b1d11-7205-4579-a9bc-9299fa917a15","new_score":2,"page_slug":"bandcampro-ai-assisted-fraud-campaign","prev_score":2,"reason":"Of 35 claims checked, 29 were confirmed and none were disputed. Applying the disputed_pct formula (disputed + unverifiable) / total, the figure is 2/35 = 5.7%, well inside the 0-10% approve band. The two unverifiable items are exact calendar dates in the timeline (claim_findings[32], claim_findings[33]) that the reviewer could not pin to a source but whose underlying facts were independently confirmed elsewhere. The four partially-supported items (claim_findings[4], [21], [28], [34]) are all minor date-precision or attribution slips -- a placeholder channel-founding date off by about five weeks, a report-publication date off by one day, and one citation crediting a technical detail to The Register that could not be independently confirmed -- none of which touch the page's core allegations. The reviewer found no link rot and no stale citations, and confirmed that the page's central 'AI-assisted' framing tracks Trend Micro's own language. The page does have an open coverage gap -- it never clarifies that the legitimate music platform Bandcamp is unrelated to the threat actor's handle 'bandcampro' -- but the reviewer rated that gap medium, not high priority, and the approve criteria treat coverage gaps as grounds for expansion, not denial, unless marked high priority. There is no mechanism in the decision rules to escalate the verdict on the strength of a medium-priority gap alone, so it does not move this page out of the approve band; it is flagged below for editorial follow-up.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}