Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 0 → 0 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 461976687
- Off-chain at
- 2026-10-27T06:55:34.161Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-10-27T06:55:47.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-10-27T06:55:47.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 3wbe7XwvMcCD7vYyeUAyhE1diosgi6kpxMZppXasmyET
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1447 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"2bdd168bc63e35876fb92461381685e5","blocked_count":2,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T06:55:33.933Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.25,"findings_hash":"4rJhZL8jb8LwtGap1QD3yybx7dXDU6eJYCgJawXvg9WC","investigation_id":"f1a778e3-6815-404c-b68d-418524eb9ca6","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":0,"page_content_hash":"c8bfa7c1c62c61b2bb14ddf27e8682426045df50737c30074ec9f8bf03527258","page_slug":"ai-dating-scam-network-dora-doni-romi-cluster","prev_score":0,"reason":"The core narrative (more than 20 apps, 4,700 personas, 2.36M messages, 25,000 users, the ten app names, Anthropic's bans and sharing with Apple and Google, Kira live on 2026-09-16) matches secondary coverage. Weaknesses: the exact April window dates and the per-app Google Play removal dates in the timeline have no support in the cited sources; the Daily Guardian citation is a 404; the 75% AI-profile figure looks like a single example presented as a general statistic; and the primary Anthropic report could not be read in full, so several figures remain unverified.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":8,"sequence_num":2,"subject_status":"unknown","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}