Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_approve · DAIQ Fake Crypto Investment Platform
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 0 → 0 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 462186544
- Off-chain at
- 2026-10-27T19:19:11.478Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-10-27T19:19:37.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-10-27T19:19:37.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- HEJSDzo9yjQ3AGHj9ZaPy7h6aLKPmJpqDj2Mk3YQKnfD
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1378 chars)
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"0aaacc6e3565a92666b3f8e33fcaaeca","band_override":null,"blocked_count":2,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T19:19:11.161Z","decision":"review_approve","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0,"investigation_id":"a6f83c4f-70f5-477f-8446-7aedf7ef6c65","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":0,"page_slug":"daiq-fake-crypto-investment-platform","prev_score":0,"reason":"None of the eight checked claims was disputed. Two (claim_findings[3], the token-withdrawal detail, and claim_findings[6], the IC3 statistic) could not be checked because the cited sites blocked the reviewer. They are excluded from the dispute rate, which comes to 0% of the six remaining claims. The core facts (amount lost, arrest date, charge, bond, 3-5% daily return promise) were confirmed by independent reporting, and the page presents the charges as allegations. The reviewer reported no omissions and found no shutdown or sanction, so the percentage band stands. The reviewer's confidence was moderate (0.55) because a quarter of the claims could not be read at source.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":6,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}